The Big Wedding Review: A New Low For… Everyone Involved

MV5BMTcwODUwMjg2Ml5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTc2NzkxOA@@._V1_SX214_If you ask most film critics what their absolute least favorite movie genre is, the most common response you are likely to get is romantic comedy.  This of course isn’t to say that there aren’t great romantic comedies out there, whether you prefer the classics (Annie Hall, When Harry Met Sally) or more modern fare (Hitch, My Big Fat Greek Wedding).  The reason why Rom-Coms are so widely reviled as a whole is that they have always been one of the biggest sources of laziness in Hollywood, and will always will be thanks to the low costs of the films involved.  Studios have learned by now that you can make a decently profitable flick by cobbling together a well known cast, shoving them into a generic story with mediocre writing and over-saturating the entire mess with incidental background music that tries to create the illusion of comedy where there is none.  With it’s blasé trailers and inexperienced direction, I had a feeling that The Big Wedding would do little to buck this trend.  Still though, I wasn’t prepared for this.  The Big Wedding wastes a mostly talented cast on a dull, predictable story, an entirely laugh-less script and flat-out strange characters, resulting in the most unbearable mess of  2013

The Plot: 2/10

A long-divorced couple fakes being married as their family unites for a wedding.

The simplicity of the IMDb summary should just how little effort went into the plot of this images (1)movie.  The set-up above is admittedly focused on in the trailers much more than it’s focused on in the movie, but the addition of additional sub-plots to the central premise does nothing to make the proceedings more interesting.  Every development is as boring as it is predictable, and the only thing I can say for it all is that it’s a blessing that the movie is only 90 minutes long.  That being said, I challenge you to find a movie that can make 90 minutes feel longer than this film does.

The Writing: 1/10

There’s very little else on this world that is more painful than watching a movie that thinks it’s funny but isn’t.  Even movies like Movie 43 and Scary Movie 5 seem to be aware of normal_TheBigWeddingPhotoshoothow terrible they are, and save a little face by the associated lack of ambition that awareness entails.  The Big Wedding, however, seems to think that it’s being clever; a thought that I can only assume was reached through massive amounts of self-delusion and disdain for the target audience.  The best/worst example of this is the film’s dialogue, which tries to strike a balance between snappy insult comedy and unexpected raunchiness.   The mix it ends up with is nothing short of weird.

The characters themselves are incredibly flat and uninteresting for the most part, which is a pretty big flaw for a film that focuses exclusively on those characters.  It’s possible MV5BMTU5NjcyODU3MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTcwNjkzOQ@@._V1._SX640_SY426_that the writers thought that keeping the characters very general and undeveloped might make them more broadly relatable, but that just isn’t the case.  The only attempts at development come in the love triangle between DeNiro, Keaton and Surandon, as well as the three’s connecting history that led them to where they are now.  That angle in particular feels like a passage way through which the writers try to convey a deep, sympathetic message of earnest cynicism about the tolls of marriage, but that message is very poorly expressed and ends up just as forgettable as the characters themselves.

As a final note, for some of the best/worst quotes of the film, check out my corresponding Live Tweet here.

The Acting: 2/10

While Movie 43 remains the biggest waste of talent 2013 has yet to offer, the starring nature of the roles involved make The Big Wedding a close second.  We have Travis imagesBickle, Louise Sawyer and Annie Hall in the same movie, yet we’re left with nothing but this?  I can understand the presences of Katherine Heigl, Topher Grace, Amanda Seyfried, and Robin Williams (who should never have donned a priest’s robes after License to Wed), but those three should never have set foot near this movie.  As a result, I’m starting to lose all of my Goodwill towards DeNiro that my recent series on Martin Scorsese has created.

As a side note, I’d like to mention the fact that in a world full of fully capable Latino actors, the decision was made to go with Ben Barnes, aka Prince Caspian, a British actor who has about as much Colombian blood in him as Robert DeNiro does.  Barnes’ hammy performance does nothing to justify his place here, either.

The Comedy: 1/10

As a preface to this section, I’d like to note that there were several people in the rows in front of me that were laughing their asses off for the entire movie, even clapping after several “Punchlines”.  The idea that anyone could have that level of enthusiasm over the comedy offered here absolutely perplexed me until I reminded myself that we live in a country where the premier of Here Comes Honey Boo Boo got higher ratings than the first Presidential Debate last year.

As I mentioned above, the film’s attempts at laughs are an odd balance of sexual humor, dysfunctional family awkwardness and situational comedy, though la-et-big-wedding-20130426-001again the latter features much more heavily in the promotional material than in the film itself.  The sex aspect of all of this feels like it’s going for shock value more than anything, especially with the age and family relationship of the cast.  Geriatric raunchiness just isn’t that funny any more, especially with recent movies like It’s Complicated handling the subject far more ably than it is handled here.  There’s also an occasional attempt at racial humor that is made even less funny by the overabundance of rich white people.

The Verdict: 1.5/10 – Revolting

- Generic plot that is equal parts boring and predictable

- Characters that are about as flat as your typical American Idol auditioner

- Absolutely no romantic or familial chemistry between the cast

- About as funny as it is original

Critical Consensus:

IMDb:  5.2/10

Rotten Tomatoes:  6%

Metacritic: 30/100

Other Reviews: 

Dan the Man Movie Reviews: 3/10

Fogs’ Movie Reviews: D

About these ads
Posted in Comedy, New Releases, Reviews, Romance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Scorsese Spotlight: Who’s That Knocking at My Door? (Cinemaniac Reviews)

Today we have another guest review in this ongoing segment courtesy of Alexander over at Cinemaniac Reviews.  Alexander also gave a great review of The Color of Money earlier in this series, which you can find here.  I’d like to thank Alexander for joining me a second time, and without further ado I present to you his review of Scorsese’s first feature-length film; Who’s That Knocking at My Door.

Who's_That_Knocking_at_My_Door_film_poster“Well, I’m not used to admitting I like Westerns.”                          – The Girl (Zina Bethune)

I’ve come to notice, recently, that a director’s feature debut rarely represents his or her later work. This isn’t the case with Martin Scorsese. We look at his filmography and notice that a number of the films are all different, but essentially the same.

Many of his films are hardboiled, upbeat, nostalgic dramas; we’re given a likable, male lead and then shown how leading a double-life makes him so easily lose his touch with his surroundings. If you don’t believe me, take a look at Mean StreetsTaxi DriverRaging BullGoodFellas, and The Aviator. And, of course, Who’s That Knocking at My Door , the overlooked masterpiece that heads the list.

Who’s That Knocking at My Door centers on J.R. (Harvey Keitel) and an unnamed tumblr_lats63oW791qzm6iko1_500woman (Zina Bethune) with whom he falls in love the moment their eyes meet. She’s trying to remain unnoticed as she reads a French magazine in a café, despite not knowing a word of French. He approaches her and points out a still of John Wayne in the magazine, leading them to discuss The Searchers. It’s a casual, genuine conversation that makes the couple as lovably amusing to us as they are to each other.

But once J.R. has taken her to his apartment, he finds that he’s hiding something from her. He’s unemployed; he’s a Catholic Italian-American in NYC; he’s taking her money behind her back when he needs it; he’s constantly warning her not to touch his belongings; and yet he has limited spare time with her. Considering the director, a crime aficionado, it may seem obvious that he’s a Mafia member, but it’s shockingly nothing all that obvious.

I thoroughly enjoyed Who’s That Knocking at My Door, and although it’s not as who-s-that-knocking-at-my-dooreasily recognizable as the director’s later work, it’s a work of genius. The film was independently produced on a minimal budget; it was limited to, most namely, black-and-white footage and lesser known players (this was Keitel’s first appearance on film). Yet the cinematography and performances still manage to greatly enhance whatever J.R. and “the girl” are feeling. Who’s That Knocking at My Door is an authentic psychodrama seen subtly through two pairs of eyes.

Postscript: The film was first released to the Chicago International Film Festival in 1967 as “I Call First”. In 1968, it adopted its most common title, “Who’s That Knocking at My Door”, for its New York premiere. In 1970, a handful of countries overseas began using another alternate title, “J.R.” Regardless, it’s the same movie, and it’s highly recommended.

The Verdict: 10/10

 Once again, you can find Alexander at The Cinemaniac or follow him on Twitter at @moviefreakblog
Posted in Guest Reviews, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Amazon Prime Pilot Rankings

1366131569-amazonOver the past week, I’ve been working my way through the eight pilot episodes released by Amazon.com as part of their new foray into the television production business.  Coming off of the heels of Netlix’s success with their release of their first original program, House of Cards, it’s no surprise that other companies like Amazon and Hulu are putting in every effort to stake out their own claims in the burgeoning digital market for original programming.  Before I go into my rankings of the pilot episodes Amazon Studios has released so far, I’d like to explain a bit more about the unique way in which the experiment is being handled.

Unlike Netflix, which put all of its eggs on basket (successfully so it happens) with one, high-budget show, Amazon Studios went with a more traditional approach by creating a larger number of pilot episodes that may or may not be given the green light for a full season depending on how well audiences respond to them.  What’s not so traditional about the process here is that rather than using focus groups to measure audiences’ reactions to a program before airing it, Amazon is opening up the floor to the general public by allowing everyone and anyone who watches the pilot episodes to leave their feedback.  After an as of yet undisclosed period of time, the decision will be made as to which episodes will make the cut and which will never again see the light of your laptop screen.

There are pluses and minuses regarding this strategy, and it remains to be seen which will outweigh the other.  One of the biggest criticisms of the system Amazon is using is that audiences are left with nothing but a single, low-budget pilot episode to judge a series by, yet history has shown that a bad pilot doesn’t necessarily translate to an unsuccessful show (I.e. Seinfeld, The Office, Parks and Recreation) nor does a great pilot translate to a successful show (FIREFLY!!!!!!!!!!!!).  That being said, at least with the methods Amazon is using we all get our chance to put in our two cents worth rather than having it all be up to some sample audience somewhere.

Now, enough talk, let’s get into the series themselves.  One thing that you will notice about the pilots below is that rather than partnering with established writers, directors and, for the most part, actors, the majority of these pilots are the result of a sort of Crowdsourcing campaign Amazon started up a short while back.  As a result, the majority of the pilots feature no-name casts, writers and/or directors.  While this keeps costs down for Amazon and shakes up the industry’s status-quo, it’s also fairly noticeable in terms of quality.  Let’s start from the bottom and work our way up.

8.  Browsers

Set in contemporary Manhattan, it follows four young people as they start their first jobs at a news website.

MV5BMjMyODcyMDkyNl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODIwNzA0OQ@@._V1_SY317_SX214_The first and foremost if not only thing you need to know is that Browsers is a musical that features original songs rather than a horde of lackluster covers (*cough cough* Glee *cough*).  If this sounds like something that you would like, the lack of alternatives on the air right now would probably lead you to be willing to see more.  I, on the other hand, fall squarely into the opposite category.  I can’t stand contemporary musicals, and because of that fact no amount of decent writing would have been able to make this Pilot anything more than nails on a chalkboard to me.  That being said, I will admit that some of the writing is completely passable which prevented me from absolutely loathing it.

The Verdict: 3.0/10 – Just Plain Bad

Watch if you like: Glee, High School Musical, etc.

7.  Betas

In Silicon Valley, the right algorithm can make you a king. And these four friends think they’ve finally cracked the code.

MV5BMTM3OTEzOTUwOF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTQ0MjA0OQ@@._V1_SY317_SX214_I had a lot of hope for this show.  From the sound of the premise, it seemed like this could function as a sort of Big Bang Theory for those who consider themselves Techies more than Trekkies.  Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be the case.  Featuring a cast of complete unknowns (which the small exception of Karan Soni aka the Indian kid from Safety Not Guaranteed) and a script which is about as light on laughs as it is on relatability, Betas has a long way to go before it’ll have any chance of converting me.  As a side note, it doesn’t help the Pilot’s situation that the “code” that the leads are trying to “crack” with their new app is something online dating sites have already been doing for years.

The Verdict: 4.0/10 – Not Worth it

Watch if you like: The Guild, King of the Nerds

6. Dark Minions

Two slackers try to make a paycheck working an intergalactic warship.

MV5BNjQzNzI4NzA1Ml5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzAxOTMzOQ@@._V1_SY317_CR1,0,214,317_This is a tough one to judge because a great deal of the issues that I had with the Pilot were due to the absolutely skeletal production budget, a fact which the show acknowledges in its first scene.  The opening of the episode features the lead character, Mel (John Ross Bowie aka Kripke from The Big Bang Theory) explaining that if the show is given a green light, it will be shot fully in stop-motion or Claymation format.  The episode itself demos this in a few scenes and it looks fine, but the rest of the episode uses a level of jerky, traditional animation that makes the first seasons of South Park look high-tech.  The writing is okay, but it never rises above mildly amusing.  The presence of a few other notable voice-actors is a plus, but not a huge one.  Bottom line, I wouldn’t be sad to see this one kick the bucket.

The Verdict: 4.5/10 – Sub-Par

Watch if you like: Troopers (CollegeHumor), Red Dwarf 

5. Those Who Can’t

Three juvenile, misfit teachers are just as immature, if not more so, than the students they teach.

MV5BMTExMjYxODI0MjZeQTJeQWpwZ15BbWU3MDM1NTY2Mzk@._V1_SY317_SX214_We’ve now crossed into the areas of the pilots I would be willing to give a second chance, however unenthusiastic I may be about some of them.  Between some fairly funny writing and an amusing premise (for some reason I like watching adults be immature around children), I can see myself sticking around for a full season of Those Who Can’t.  That being said, I’m still not very enthusiastic about the cast itself.  The three leads are all character types we’ve seen before, and the actors behind them do absolutely nothing to rise above that.  That being said, it always takes a while for a show’s cast and crew to find its identity, and that’s something I think that this show could easily do if it’s given the chance.

The Verdict: 6.0/10 – Passable

Watch if you like: Bad Teacher, Workaholics

4.  Supanatural

MV5BMTc2MTU0NDAyMl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTAxOTMzOQ@@._V1_SY317_CR1,0,214,317_While it may not be my favorite of the eight Pilots, I will at least say that Supanatural was the most pleasantly surprising seeing as I was expecting to absolutely hate it.  Between low quality animation and characters often flirt with the boundaries between comedy and overt racism, there are plenty of reasons why any of you might dislike Supanatural.  In the end, it all depends on your preferences, but if you’re like me in that you enjoy the occasional tryst into Cartoon Network’s Adult Swim territory, this might be right up your alley.  As I said before, the lead characters’ Barbershop-toned dialogue forces you to occasionally ask yourself if it’s okay to be laughing.  To the show’s credit though, I prefer mildly offensive humor to no humor at all, I’ll take occasional discomfort over boredom any day.

The Verdict: 6.0/10 – Passable

Watch if you like: Metalocalypse, Pretty much anything else on Adult Swim

3. Zombieland

Four survivors are killin’ zombies and searching for a place to call home. At least they have each other.

MV5BNTk0Mzg0OTQ2Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTA3ODIzOQ@@._V1_SY317_CR2,0,214,317_If you’ve heard of any one of the Pilots here, it’s probably this one.  Whether the thought of a television adaptation of the 2009 movie filled you with dread or anticipation, the fact that you even knew about it means that it has a good chance of making the cut.  I myself and a HUGE fan of the movie itself, so when I first heard that it was being continued on the small screen I was pretty optimistic.  As time when on and the revelation was made that not only would the original actors not be involved, but that their characters would be maintained and replace by a set of no-names, my optimism took a complete nose-dive.  My only consolation was that the movie’s writers were still signed on.  Now that I’ve seen the Pilot itself, I can tell you that it is exactly what you’d expect from a small-screen adaptation with the same writers but a different cast from the film version.  The result is incredibly frustrating as there are plenty of ways in which the sick, Zombie-killin’ fun of the source material is preserved,  but all of those ways are stained by the fact that the new cast can’t hold the smallest of candles to the original four.  The sad thing is, the new people aren’t necessarily that bad, but by placing them into the same roles as Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone and Abigail Breslin the producers force the comparison between the old and the new.  This is almost a deal-breaker for me here, but for the sake of the writing and the fun take on the Zombie genre I will try to withhold judgement until I see more.

The Verdict: 6.0/10 – Passable

Watch if you like: Zombieland, Kickass (though both movies are vastly superior)

2. Alpha House

Follows four senators who live together in a rented house in Washington DC.

MV5BMjIyMDA4NDU1M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTA1NjYzOQ@@._V1_SY317_SX214_How bad can a show be when it stars John Goodman?  Apparently the answer is not bad at all, but still not nearly as great as it should be.  Alpha House boasts a great cast, an extremely promising premise, and the full Piñata of political satire opens up a huge amount of potential comedy gold.  On those merits alone I’d be willing to sign up for a full season of the show.  Unfortunately, the Pilot itself just isn’t that funny or insightful in much of any way at all.  John Goodman is woefully underused, and the much-hyped Bill Murray cameo is over before you even really realize it’s him.  I still have high hopes for the show, but it’s going to have to do some pretty serious soul-searching before it comes back for full season.

The Verdict: 6.5/10 – Perfectly Adequate

Watch if you like: Doonsebury, The Colbert Report

1.  Onion News Empire

Set behind the scenes of The Onion News Network that shows just how far journalists will go to stay at the top of their game.

MV5BMTgyNTIyMjc4NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODY0NjYzOQ@@._V1_SY317_SX214_Of all of the episodes here, which are all intended as comedies, this was this only one that had me legitimately laughing out loud.  Like Supanatural, the bottom line with whether or not you’ll like Onion News Empire is whether or not you like the kind of ridiculous, over-the-top satire that it revolves around.  I for one am a pretty big fan of the real-life fake news site that lends the show its namesake, so the kind of humor here worked really well for me.  Combine that style of writing with a great cast that features Jeffrey Tambor (Arrested Development) and Christopher Masterson (Malcolm in the Middle), and the result is an extremely entertaining Pilot that feel more confident in its identity than anything else on the list.

The Verdict: 8.0/10 – Pretty Damn Great

Watch if you like: The Onion News Network, Children’s Hospital

Well there you have them, all eight new episodes from Amazon’s Pilot Week.  As a whole, I was pretty disappointed by low production values and an overall lack of substantial comedy, but the first step is always the hardest.  I have great faith that Amazon will be able to learn from this experiment and continue to grow its presence on the production side of the business.  Of course I’m a bit biased as I’ll be starting work at Amazon in a few months, but I’ll leave it up to you to weigh the fairness of my opinions.

In any case you can find all of the Pilots here, or you can click on the link for each episode in the title to be taken directly to it.  Each is completely free to watch online and I’d love to hear any feedback you might have.  I haven’t heard much of anything about these episodes from other bloggers, so I’d love to get some other opinions in the mix.

Posted in Editorials | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Place Beyond the Pines Review: Sins of the Father

MV5BMjc1OTEwNjU4N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNzUzNDIwOQ@@._V1_SX214_I had been planning on making this movie the first film I’d seen this year that I didn’t have to based on theater count.  Then, Focus Features decided to give a nationwide expansion anyways this weekend so that particular title remains unfulfilled.  The past few months having been filled with the brim with simply okay offerings, I was itching to finally see something truly great come out of 2013.  With a cast like this and glowing reviews from most critics, it seemed more likely than not that The Place Beyond the Pines would break through the mob of mediocrity that has plagued the winter and spring seasons.  Thankfully, a set of dynamite performances from Gosling and Cooper counteract an occasionally slow pace to make The Place Beyond the Pines the most powerful and memorable picture of the year thus far.

The Plot: 7/10

A motorcycle stunt rider turns to robbing banks as a way to provide for his lover and their newborn child, a decision that puts him on a collision course with an ambitious rookie cop navigating a department ruled by a corrupt detective.

Cue the collective swoons of every female audience member

Cue the collective swooning of every female audience member

There are a lot of things that the plot does well, but for the sake of argument I’ll focus on what it comes up short on.  The first and foremost of these is length and pacing.  The film can be divided up into three separate acts; the first focusing on Luke (Ryan Gosling), the second on Avery (Bradley Cooper) and the third on the pair’s respective children.  Gosling’s act is by far the strongest, but while the other two definitely have their moments they don’t have nearly the amount of impact that the first forty minutes do.  In addition, the transition between the second and third acts drags quite a bit due to the somewhat predictable nature of the time jump.

The Writing: 8/10

This is the most clothing Eva has ever worn

This is the most clothing Eva has ever worn

While the strength of the movie lies in its performances, the writing behind those performances is still noteworthy.  There are quite a few memorable lines, such as the trailer-featured “If you ride like lightning, you’re gonna crash like thunder”.  On the whole, the dialogue feels very genuine and makes it really easy to focus on the story itself rather than getting hung up on how real the characters feel.

The biggest strength in the script, though, is how well it handles the idea of moral ambiguity in its characters.  A lot of movies try to tackle this angle by simply having main characters do both bad and good things, but The Place Beyond the Pines really nails it by completely removing morality as a frame altogether.  It weaves together desperation, ambition, and guilt to the ultimate effect that mishandled attempts to act in the best interest of one’s children fuel every “evil” act.  In this way it doesn’t matter that most audience members have not encountered the same situations as the characters on screen; we can all sympathize with the blinding nature of love.

The Acting: 10/10

Money talks, Ryan Gosling needs no words

Money talks, Ryan Gosling needs no words

If you’re planning on going to see this movie, this is what you’re probably paying the $10 for.  If that’s the case, you will not be disappointed.  Gosling gives what may be his finest performance to date, though that fact makes it all the more frustrating that his screen time is so low in comparison with the movie as a whole.  His story arc burns bright and fast, and makes the rest of the film look slow by comparison.

Bradley Cooper also his hot streak from last year’s Silver Linings Playbook with a very strong performance here.  His character is admittedly much more compelling during the second act than the third, and the story arc given to him isn’t quite as interesting as Gosling’s, but Cooper’s performance is easily deserving of an Oscar nomination assuming the academy isn’t distracted by some of the offerings that late 2013 will inevitably have in store.

In this case the sin of the father is bringing another guido wannabe into the world

In this case the sin of the father is bringing another Guido wannabe into the world

The person that really surprised me, however, was Dane DeHaan (aka the kid from Chronicle).  He has the handicap of the lackluster developments of the third act, but once he starts unraveling the truth about his real father things start to take a sharp turn for the nail-biting, he really starts to shine.  Unfortunately, I couldn’t quite say the same for Emory Cohen, who plays Avery’s unremarkable “bad seed” of a son.

As a final note, if you’re expecting anything substantial from the female cast (which seeing as Eva Mendes occupies 1/3 of the poster space that wouldn’t be a huge thing to ask) you will probably be disappointed.  This is a story of fathers and sons, and as a result there isn’t much of a place for the mothers and daughters of the film to make a name for themselves.

The Drama: 9/10

For once SCS (Shaky Camera Syndome) is actually a good thing

For once SCS (Shaky Camera Syndome) is actually a good thing

Again, the film’s dramatic quotient is pretty strongly tied with the aforementioned pacing, but when it hits its high notes there it doesn’t pull any punches whatsoever.  There are several scenes that specifically squeeze every drop of tension from the actors’ performances, but some of the most memorable are the motorcycle chase scenes in the first act.  In this sense I give a lot of the credit to director Derek Cianfrance, whose frantic cinematography makes the audience feel the sort of panic Luke is experiencing during the chases themselves. I couldn’t help but think of Drive in terms of how exciting the film’s chase scenes were without having to use the sort of over-the-top explosive action you might expect from, say, a Fast and the Furious movie.

The Verdict: 8.5/10 – Impressive

+ Incredibly performances from Cooper, Gosling and DeHaan

+ Amazing cinematography from Cianfrance

+ An interesting exploration into the cause-effect relationship between father and son

- Not as much Gosling as you’d hope; loses some steam at the start of the third act

Critical Consensus:

Rotten Tomatoes: 80%

IMDb:  7.8/10

Metacritic: 66/100

Other Reviews:

Fogs’ Movie Reviews: A

Fast Film Reviews: 4.5/5

The Cinema Monster: 9/10

The Code is Zeek: 4.5/5

PG Cooper’s Movie Reviews: A-

Entertainment Maven: “Heart-Pumping”

Cinemawolf: B+/A-

Dan the Man Movie Reviews: 7.5/10

Mercifully Short Reviews: 6/10

Black Sheep Reviews: 3/5

On the Screen Reviews: 3/5

Posted in Drama, New Releases, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Spotlight on Scorsese: After Hours (The Cinema Monster)

Today we have yet another entry into my Scorsese Spotlight series, this time from Joey over at The Cinema Monster.  One of the newest sites I follow, The Cinema Monster features a combination of reviews, Top 10 series, award season coverage and more.  Go ahead and check out his page here once you’ve read his review of another Scorsese diamond in the rough; After Hours.

after_hours_ver2Coordinating its sly humour, melodramatic performances, and obscure content that, at times, is unsettling and disturbing into a vastly entertaining ordeal, After Hours is a subtle, strange, and sadly underrated Martin Scorsese film filled with the usual facets we’ve grown to expect from his mastered craft. Consisting of a night lived perpetually through hazy events and vague characters. After Hours might pull a few more punches and be just a bit more over the top then your typical Scorsese picture, but the hypnotic performances, faultless camerawork, and inconceivable storyline are impossible to dismiss. After Hours, beaming with its incredible circumstances that cause gut wrenching anxiousness, doesn’t solely rely on its ambiguity. Starring Griffin Dune and Rosanna Arquette, After Hours is cast with brilliance. Blending in elements of social disparity and emotional depth, After Hours was cinema ahead of its time.

936full-after-hours-screenshotPaul (Dune) is a word processor who openly voices his displeasure for his life’s boring and lonely nature. When Paul meets Marcy (Arquette) at a coffee shop after work, she gives him her phone number. After the two part ways, Paul returns home and eventually works up the courage to call Marcy. She invites Paul to come over to her place in SoHo, even though it is late at night. When Paul hops into a cab that has little to no regard for the rules of the road, his crazy night has begun. Encountering multiple bizarre characters such as punks, criminals, psychos, and an angry mob that is ruthlessly hunting him down, Paul just wants to get home.

Imagine in the most general sense that Martin Scorsese undertook the challenge of a romantic comedy. Now, considering his track record and mindset, After Hours didn’t disappoint me in the slightest. In brief summarization, After Hours is essentially Scorsese’s images (5)take on rom-com. He’s  managed to mix in several other genres and characteristics that a Scorsese picture would be doomed without. But honestly, I wouldn’t have it any other way. As he clashes the unpredictability of humanities darkness and normal, kindhearted nature, Scorsese defines and balances the contrast. Scorsese has an uncannily keen eye for filming and flaunts his repertoire throughout the film. In my opinion, After Hours contains some of his best filmed sequences, really breathtaking and humbling.

Usually I’d rip apart every facet of a Scorsese film, just to get to the guts. You know, the gooey mechanisms, the organs, the force that sends him into motion. But with After Hours, the best way to digest it is to simply inhale. Sit back, relax, take it for what it is. However, I’m After hours1a reviewer and this is a film blog, so, for lack of better words, the show must go on. I suppose the most intriguing point throughout After Hours is the consequences of being too trusting, too fast. At every turn, Scorsese introduces characters who are somewhat irrelevant to the story. However, in time, their importance expands. It is no coincidence that there growing relevance coincides with their abrupt turn from hospitable to hostile. The structuring and how every occurrence and antagonist continues to build and fortify on top of the previous is staggering. The plot may be too fantastical, but each one of us has had one of those never-ending nights. After Hours makes The Hangover look like a walk in the park.

While Griffin Dune is outstanding, more to the point, believable in his  performance, which is imperative to a film that needs assistance staying grounded. It is Rosanna Arquette who I believe really took the reigns in After Hours. Her idiosyncrasies and carefree inhibition are images (9)infatuating. Every tiny, misplaced laugh, situational depression, and vicious rants add another layer to an already versatile tale. Griffin Dune starts off a tad isolating and his calm demeanour is for some reason unnerving. But as we continue to accompany him on this journey for companionship as it evolves into an all out manhunt, our sympathy evolves with it. We suddenly begin to root and urge Dune along unquestioned, which is an outstanding feat that I heavily applaud Scorsese and Dune for. Lastly, is there any role that Catherine O’hara doesn’t portray a strung out, emotional lunatic? Maybe it’s because she is so effective and intimidating.

After Hours is an intoxicating joy ride that never ends. Bursting with loveable characters, quirky laughs, and heartless severity. Scorsese has spawned another original masterpiece.

The Verdict: 9/10 – Incredible

Again, you can catch up with Joey at The Cinema Monster, and if you’re interested in taking part in the series (there are still a few films up for grabs, including Cape Fear!) go ahead and let me know in the comments below or shoot me an email at aswinn92@live.com.

Posted in Guest Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Rorschach’s Top 10 Post-Apocalyptic Movies

In honor of Oblivion‘s release this weekend, I thought it might be fun to take a look at the sub-genre of Post-Apocalyptic movies.  We humans seem to have an undying fascination with our own demise, and over the last fifty years or so of film making we’ve proven just how imaginative we are when it comes to how that demise might occur.  The following list contains my ten favorite films that take place after the downfall of society as we know it.

There are a few things to note here.  One, as usual I am only pulling my choices from movies that I have actually seen, so the absence of a few popular entries like 12 Monkeys is not a judgment of quality so much as it is an observance of my own ability to not see every movie ever made.  Also, these are all films that deal with the aftermath of an apocalyptic event, not necessarily with the apocalyptic event itself.  In other words, movies like, say, anything directed by Roland Emmerich (2012, The Day After Tomorrow) would not qualify even if they weren’t massive piles of CGI-laden crap.

10. Reign of Fire (2002)

MV5BMTQzMTUxNTMxNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwODg2ODU3._V1_SY317_CR2,0,214,317_There are plenty of reasons why you might call Reign of Fire a terrible movie, but none of those matter when they’re compared with the reason I include it on my list; Motherf*cking Dragons.  Of all the ways the world might end, be it Zombie Apocalypse, massive disease outbreak, Nuclear Holocaust, or what have you, nothing even comes close to the level of Nerdvana that is “Death by Dragon Attack”.  Combine that premise with a surprisingly decent cast (even if they are wasted on a mediocre script and an overly serious tone) and you end up with one of the greatest big-budget B-Movies of all time.

9. I Am Legend (2007)

MV5BMTU4NzMyNDk1OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTEwMzU1MQ@@._V1_SY317_CR0,0,214,317_You can talk all day about how poorly done the CGI Zombie/Vampire characters are or how much you do or don’t like Will Smith, but at the end of the day what really makes I Am Legend stand out is how it sets the standard for how to not only survive in a post-apocalyptic world, but survive in style.  I mean, it’s always easy to think about the dangers of starvation and roving bands of raiders, but it’s just so much more fun to focus on driving a gorgeous sports car through New York City at 100 miles per hour, or working on your golf swing off of the deck of an aircraft carrier.  Not only that, but you get to do all of this with your trusty canine companion at your side (Spoiler alert, prepare to have this aspect of the film turn on you in an emotional-punch-to-the-groin sort of way).  It’s not high art, but it’s still solid entertainment.

8.  28 Days Later (2002)

MV5BNzM2NDYwNjM3OF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwNDYxNzk5._V1_SX214_Despite the issues many have with the concept of “Running Zombies”, there are few that will not admit to being scared sh*tless by this movie.  Proving once again that Danny Boyle is a true directorial shape-shifter in terms of his genre preference, 28 Days Later is one of the most frantically terrifying films I’ve ever seen.  As for the running Zombies complaint, I would like to point out that technically these are not Zombies so much as they are Rabid Humans.  In any case, what really sets the film apart from the pack is how well it does in keeping both feet on the ground when it comes to realistic mechanics and plot developments as logical as they are brutal.  Next time you’re in the mood to pull an all-nighter for whatever reason, you will find that this functions just as well as several cups of coffee in its ability to prevent you from being able to sleep.

7. Escape From New York (1981)

MV5BMjA0NzA5NzgzNF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwMzY2OTI5._V1_SY317_CR1,0,214,317_When it comes to the end of the world, few decades can measure up to the perfect mix of cheesiness and awesomeness that the 80′s bring to the table.  Sure, the budgets were low and the fashion sense was questionable, but Escape From New York proves that the only personal accessories that really matter are Eye-Patches and Mac-10′s.  As long as those two are present, Snake Plissken could wear a bonnet and a feather boa and still be a certified boss.  Pepper in a straightforward plot (Save the president and stay alive for the sequel) and a pretty damn cool premise and you’re left with one of the most deserving cult classics of all time.

6. Planet of the Apes (1968)

MV5BMTY4MDg0OTgyMF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTMxNzIzMQ@@._V1_SY317_CR9,0,214,317_If you find yourself in a global catastrophe and you’re curious as to where the tipping point is between “Thing’s aren’t looking so great” and “The Apocalypse has come”, here’s a great little litmus test; is the Statue of Liberty still standing?  If so, you’re in the clear.  If not, promptly drop to your knees, pound the ground and shout “You Maniacs, You Blew it up!  Damn you, God Damn you all to hell!!!!”  In any case, even if the world isn’t ending you can go ahead and do that anyway wherever you may be if you’re looking for a conversation starter.  It’s movies like Planet of the Apes that remind us of the downside of ending the Cold War; Sci-Fi now has to start making up ways for the world to end that just don’t stick like they used to (I’m looking at you, The Day The Earth Stood Still remake).  If you are looking for a great way to re-live the glory days of our people’s self-destructive ambitions  go ahead and pop in a DVD of this one and enjoy.

5. Wall-E (2008)

MV5BMTczOTA3MzY2N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTYwNjE2MQ@@._V1_SY317_CR0,0,214,317_I could write pages and pages about why my undying love for Pre-Disney Pixar, but I’ll go ahead and let this little movie speak for me.  There aren’t many movies that can go a whole 40 minutes without a single word being spoken while still keeping the audience firmly glued to their seats.  Wall-E is filled with the kind of innocent sweetness that requires no words whatsoever, the kind of innocent sweetness that gives Pixar the sort of heart that imitators like Dreamworks and Blue Sky Animation will never have.  If you were to look at Wall-E on paper, especially the post-apocalyptic elements that qualify it for this list, you might wonder how it ever got made in the first place.  When everything comes together, it’s truly amazing how sincere a love story between two robotic characters can be.

4. Dawn of the Dead (1978)

MV5BMjE1NzI5OTA1OF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjg1MDUyMQ@@._V1_SY317_CR6,0,214,317_I have my own issues with this film (The Undead aren’t that scary and there’s a huge amount of imbalance between the soundtrack and the movie itself, among others) but it’s hard to beat a Zombie Apocalypse when it comes to building a post-apocalyptic wasteland.  The setting of an overrun shopping mall is also nothing short of brilliant, even if the locale itself would be much less than optimal in terms defensibility.  Then again, who would want to watch a bunch of people be safe in a secure underground bunker for 2 hours when the alternative is continuously battling undead and roving bands of raiders from behind the counter of a Jamba Juice.  As a side note I did love the recognition that rednecks would be pretty much set if the walking dead were to ever rise up and take over the world.

3. The Matrix (1999)

MV5BMjEzNjg1NTg2NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwNjY3MzQ5._V1_SY317_CR6,0,214,317_While I’m not nearly as hateful of the sequels as many people are, I still don’t harbor a single doubt that the first film is reigns supreme by a long shot.  The world the the Wachowski brothers created In the Matrix is one of the most creatively robust premises of all time.  Sure, there are a few logical fallacies (like the fact that farming humans couldn’t possibly have been the most efficient way for the machines to get energy), but as long as you suspend disbelief in all of the right places, all you have to do is sit back and let your perceptions of reality be assaulted until you start to wonder yourself whether or not there really is a spoon.  Pepper in some great martial arts and one of the biggest badass characters of all time (talking about Morphius, not Neo, just to be clear) and what you end up with is one of the best science fiction films of the past 20 years.

2. Children of Men (2006)

MV5BMTkxNDA5MTM5NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTYyNDE0MQ@@._V1_SY317_CR0,0,214,317_The sheer amount of people declaring this one of “The Most Underrated Sci-Fi movies of all time” sort of undermines the meaning of the word “Underrated”.  Whatever word you go with, I think we can all agree that Children of Men is one of the best visions of the end of the world that Hollywood has ever given us.  Equal parts bleak and hopeful, what really sets the film aside from the other movies in this category is that it is the perfect embodiment of the T.S. Eliot quote “This is the way the world ends; not with a band, but with a whimper”.   Because of this “slow burn” approach to the end of days, some might disagree with my placement of this film above entries like Planet of the Apes or Dawn of the Dead, but I when it comes to the film’s emotional impact on me as a viewer there is no question of which one comes out on top.

1. Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior

MV5BMTcxMDUyODY1OF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwOTQzNDk4._V1_SX214_After the somber nature of my #2 pick, maybe this choice might come as a bit of a surprise.  To that I would respond that you will be hard pressed to find a cinefile who only likes one kid of movie, and I am no exception.  Sometimes I like a movie with a more serious tone, but most of the time I would much more gladly watch something with a good amount of entertainment value and that’s something that Mad Max 2 is in no short supply of.  It’s a bit sad to watch the movie and then think of what Mel Gibson has become in recent years, but so long as you can put his racist comments and drooping features out of your mind it’s easy to see why he was something of a Ryan Gosling or Channing Tatum in his younger days.  Australian accents aside, the barren Hellscape of The Road Warrior in all of its gasoline-worshipping glory is almost cool enough to make up for the whole “ravaged by raping, pillaging raiders” thing.  Of course, there’s also no beating that ending car chase…

Well, there you have them, my 10 favorite movies featuring the aftermath of the end of days.  What are some of yours?

Posted in Editorials | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 30 Comments

Two Cents Worth: Who’s Your Favorite Stoner Character?

s-MARIJUANA-SUPERCUT-large300Marijuana, Weed, Pot, Ganja, Mary Jane, the Chronic, the Sticky Icky; no matter what you call it or what you think of it, there’s no denying that Cannabis has contributed to some of the best comic relief in the history of cinema.  Whether a film tosses a stoner in for a few yucks on the side or revolves around them entirely, having at least one character in your film with a fondness puffing the magic dragon is a surefire way to boost your movie’s LPM ratio (Laughs per minute).

On this, the day of April 20th (aka Stoner Christmas), I thought it would be appropriate to get into the holiday spirit in the most innocent way possible; by watching other people take part on screen.  In the mean time though, I thought it might be interesting to hear from you regarding the following question:

Who is/are your favorite Stoner character(s) of all time?

My choice is a two-way tie between two very different characters from two VERY different movies.

cabin-in-the-woods-fran-kranz_240-225x300The first is Marty (Fran Kranz) from Joss Whedon’s Horror Comedy masterpiece Cabin in the Woods.  This might be a bit too much of a recent choice for a lot of people, but I stand by it.  Marty goes beyond usual wise-cracking stoner tropes and blossoms into the ultimate pot-smoking badass.  Because of my firm belief that everyone should see this movie and see it unspoiled, I’ll spare you some of the more specific reasons why I love Marty so much, but they are numerous.  To be fair though, the idea of using a collapsible travel mug bong as a weapon to fight the nefarious walking dead renders any other reason for loving him moot.

The second is The Dude (Jeff Bridges) from The Big Lebowski.  The Dude’s laid back, zen-master attitude remains one of the most compelling arguments for the Lebowskilimolegalization of the drug that I can think of.  I mean, compare the number of movies about people’s lives spiraling out of control from alcohol addiction with the number of movies about people’s lives spiraling out of control because of pot addiction and the results speak for themselves.  In any case, The Dude stands out as one of my favorite Stoners of all time for reasons that are too numerous and self-explanatory to list out here.  The Dude abides, nuff said.

Now I’d like to hear from you.  Are you also a Dude fan, or do you skew more towards Cheech and Chong, Jay and Silent Bob, or any of the countless other iconic pot-heads of the past several decades?  Sound off in the comments below!

Posted in Two Cents' Worth | Tagged , , , , | 18 Comments

Scary Movie 5 Review: Just Plain Pathetic

images (11)Of all of the highs and lows of 2013 so far, this is by far the least surprising.  The first Scary Movie was a fun, silly romp that served nicely to my preteen comedy preferences.  Ever since then, things have gone so far downhill that the continued existence of the franchise is confounding.  What’s even more confounding is the fact that even the worst of spin-off parody movies like Date Movie, Epic Movie, and Vampires Suck and, to some extent, Haunted House earlier this year, have almost all made a sizable return on their budgets at the box office.  When it comes down to it, movies like this just don’t cost that much to make so the bar for success is incredibly low; they are the Reality TV of the cinematic world.  As a result, no matter how bad it is we will probably be seeing many more “Fill in the blank” Movie projects excreted from Hollywood in the near future.  Painfully unfunny, terribly acted and completely unfocused, Scary Movie 5‘s only saving grace is that I will probably forget about it completely by the end of this review.

The Plot: 1/10

A couple begin to experience some unusual activity after bringing their newborn son home from the hospital. With the help of home-surveillance cameras and a team of experts, they learn they’re being stalked by a nefarious demon.

As is the case with past entries in the franchise, Scary Movie 5 bases itself primarily on the plot of one film while routinely dipping in and out of others.  The main frame for Scary images (14)Movie 5 is Mama, which in the scheme of things is such a small blip on the horror genre’s radar that it really doesn’t merit this amount of focus.  What is more confusing, however, is how many other films the movie parodies that have absolutely nothing to do with the Horror genre.  Among these are clumsy plot lines a la Black Swan, Inception and Rise of the Planet of the Apes.  At this point, nobody expects the plot of an entry in this series to be anything more than a lazily assembled Frankenstein’s monster of other films, but that doesn’t make it suck any less.

The Writing: 2/10

If anything separates this from Haunted House, it’s the fact that Haunted House doesn’t even feel like it had a screenplay at all.  It was just Marlon Wayans acting idiotic for 90 images (13)minutes, with a few random B-List comedians peppered in for variety.  Here, it feels like there is a script that people are reading off of, but that almost makes things worse.  It’s way more painful to watch something fail when it feels like that thing was trying to be good,  and as a result I spent half of this movie wanting to reach out to the writers and say “Oh Honey, you actually thought you were being clever?”

The Acting: 2/10

The only upside to this element of the film is that Charlie Sheen and Lindsay Lohan are only on camera for about five minutes, so their collective black hole of awful can only drain images (15)so much out of the audience.  The downside is that the cast picks up the reins for the two right as soon as they’re dropped.  Ashley Tisdale and Simon Rex don’t even deserve the wasted digital breath of an evaluation here, so I’m just going to jump to the biggest tragedy of the movie; the fact that people I like somehow got dragged into the mess.  Terry Crews, Molly Shannon and Modern Family’s Sarah Hyland all have brief roles that are far more of an insult to the actors themselves than they are a bonus to the movie.  Still not as tragic as Movie 43, but sad all the same

The Comedy: 3/10

The only reason I give a slightly higher score here is that the humor here is exactly what you’d expect from the series at this point, so the bar I had set for the category was so low SCARY MOVIE 5that it would have taken a monumental amount of failure to miss it.  I’ll even admit that there were two moments that got a slight chuckle out of me; one, a poster for 127 Hours: The Ballet, and two a possibly unintentional reference to Rule 34 of the internet.  Aside from these two moments, however, you will find nothing but an all out barrage of cheap humor which ranges from scatology to overt racism.

For some more specific examples of the humor involved, check out my Live Tweet of the movie on twitter.  You can either find my account or search under #rorschachtweets for the full commentary.

The Verdict: 2.0/10 – Symphony of Suck

- Lazy and non-cohesive plot cobbled together from other, better films

- Drags some legitimately good people down with it

- Not an ounce of real comedy

+ It delivers exactly what you’d expect, so if you think you’ll like it you probably will

Critical Consensus:

Rotten Tomatoes: 5%

IMDb: 4.2/10

Metacritic: 11/100

Other Reviews:

Fogs’ Movie Reviews

Posted in Comedy, New Releases, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Oblivion Review: Another Day in Paradise

Oblivion-2013-Movie-Halfway through the fourth month of the year, things are finally starting to look up as we pass from the doldrums of spring to the excitement of the summer blockbuster season.  So far, 2013 has been a pretty dismal year, but with Iron Man 3 just a few weeks away I finally feel like I’m starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel.  Of my 10 Most Anticipated Movies of the Year, Oblivion is only the second to hit theaters (the first being the mind-numbingly disappointing A Good Day to Die Hard).  As a result, there was a pretty high bar the movie had to reach in order to give me any sense of optimism for the coming months.  As usual, I did my best to shield myself from reading any early reviews but from my peripheral understanding people seem to have decidedly mixed feelings over director Joseph Kosinski’s follow up to his 2010 directorial debut; Tron: Legacy.  Luckily, not that I’ve actually seen the finished product I can assure you that this stands as a noticeable step up for Kosinski, and I have no doubt that his upward progress won’t stop any time soon.  Oblivion borrows fairly heavily from many other modern science fiction films, but outstanding visuals and an impressively ambitious story are more than enough to distinguish it from the rest of the pack.

The Plot: 7/10

A veteran assigned to extract Earth’s remaining resources begins to question what he knows about his mission and himself.

There’s very little I can say here without spoiling things seeing as the movie’s promised twists are one of its biggest draws.  What I can say is that the story line goes through a lot of hoops to make you curious as to what the hell is really going on, but in doing so it walks a Oblivion-Movie-Review-2013fine line between intrigue and outright confusion.  When you work this many twists and turns into a movie like this, what really matters in the end is how well you explain what’s happening in a satisfying way.  Even though many of these explanations take their sweet time in arriving, I will give the movie credit for managing to plug up most of the plot holes I observed.  That being said, several of the biggest twists here count among the most damning elements of the film in terms of how liberally they pull from other movies (I won’t say which ones so as to avoid spoilers).

The Writing: 6/10

In addition to directing the film, Kosinski also took the primary role in writing the screenplay.  While the man seems like a natural when it comes to effects, staging, and 2417_FPT3_00138R-650x342camera work, his lack of experience shows through the awkwardness of some of his writing.  In this case, Oblivion suffers from similar issues as Tron: Legacy does in that it’s characters just don’t feel all that human.  Jack is given plenty of development in terms of his Wall-E-ish collection of Old Earth relics, but very few of the other characters have any defining attributes to speak of.  Of course, some of this is can be explained through eventual plot developments, but it’s just not enough to make up for the flatness of characters themselves.

The Acting: 6/10

images (1)I have my issues with Tom Cruise and his self-obsessed mid-life crisis that reached its apex with last year’s Jack Reacher, but there’s not a single part of me that denies that the man has the sort of natural charisma that very few other people in Hollywood can claim.  Thankfully, Oblivion feels like much less of an ego boost for cruise than Reacher did.  Cruise is still just as fun to watch now as he was 20 years ago, and I give him a lot of credit for making the movie work on any “human” level whatsoever.

images (3)Oblivion also shows that, once again, Morgan Freeman can never be anything but a huge bonus to any film he’s in.  His role is pretty light here and I couldn’t help but feel like Beech is just a poor man’s Morphius, but he’s still a great presence whenever he’s onscreen no matter what you think of the plot twists he brings about.  I also loved that Nikolaj Coster-Waldau (aka Jaime Lannister) gets at least a few legitimately bad ass moments, despite the otherwise complete lack of depth to his character

images (4)Unfortunately, the women of Oblivion leave a lot to be desired.  Andrea Risenborough does a decent job from an acting standpoint, but her character is just so odd and confusingly motivated that I never really found myself caring about what happens to her.  Olga Kurylenko is also pretty flat as Julia, a mysterious woman whose arrival shakes things up for Jack and Victoria on a seismic level.  Kurylenko looks good and all, but her lifeless performance and complete and utter lack of chemistry with Cruise make her easily forgettable.

The Sci-Fi: 9/10

oblivion-5As you can probably guess from the trailers, the film’s visuals are nothing short of magnificent.  Between the amazing looking storm fronts and post-apocalyptic vistas to the sterile, futuristic look of the technology, I firmly believe that Oblivion stands alongside last year’s visual knockout Prometheus in terms of visual bang-for-your-buck.  I highly recommend that you catch this in IMAX if you are able, the sights and sounds here make it the best use of the format I’ve seen all year.

As for the actual mechanics of this fictional, futuristic world, things are still pretty cool but there’s just nothing quite original enough to really hit home.  If you haven’t seen a whole lot of modern science fiction, this probably won’t bother you that much but I know that there are quite a few people out there who will roll their eyes at some of the genre cliches the movie’s premises contain (again, I wish I could say more but spoilers are around every corner here)

The Verdict: 7.5/10 – Superior

+ One of the most beautiful and well-crafted post-apocalyptic landscapes I’ve ever seen

+ An ambitious story that (mostly) plugs up its own plot holes

+ Even at 50, Tom Cruise still feels at home in this sort of role

- The human aspects of the story just don’t hit home on the same level as the visuals

Critical Consensus

Rotten Tomatoes: 59%

IMDb: 7.2/100

Metacritic: 55%

Other Reviews:

Tim’s Film Reviews: 92%

Keith at the Movies: 4/5

Fogs’ Movie Reviews: B+

The Code is Zeek: 3.5/5

FlixChatter: 3.5/5

Let’s Go to the Movies: “Definitely worth a watch”

PG Cooper’s Movie Reviews: 3/5

The Focused Filmographer: 3/5

Black Sheep Reviews: 3/5

Terry Malloy’s Pigeon Coop: 3/5

Mercifully Short Reviews: 6/10

Dan the Man Movie Reviews: 5/10

Fast Film Reviews: 2/5

Posted in New Releases, Sci-fi | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 22 Comments

My First LAMMY Nomination!

I just wanted to give a quick shout out to the fact that I’ve been officially nominated for the 2013 LAMMY Awards under the “Best New Lamb” category.  For those of you who aren’t familiar with the LAMB, aka the Large Associasion of Movie Bloggers, it is a central hub for movie themed bloggers around the world.  Among many things, it functions as a sort of Rotten Tomatoes for non-professional or semi-professional bloggers like myself, and it currently holds over 1500 members.  The LAMMY awards are an annual awards ceremony the site holds to honor members that stand out above the pack.  Out of those 1500 members, under 60 went on to the final round of nominations, and I was very surprised and please to see that I made it through to that pack.

1 Nomination

I’m going up against a lot of great bloggers, many of whom I’ve gotten the chance to get to know pretty well over the past three months.  Here are some of the great sites that I’m competing with for the award:

In addition, I’d like to put forward a little plug for some of my friends in different categories, including…

The Cinematic Katzenjammer:

  • Best Design
  • Best Rating System
  • Best New Blogger
  • Best Podcast
  • Best Movie Reviewer
  • Best Running Feature
  • Best Community Builder
  • Best Blog

Fogs’ Movie Reviews

  • Most Knowledgeable Writer
  • Best Blog-a-thon/Meme
  • Best Film Festival and Convention Coverage
  • Best Podcast 
  • Best Running Feature
  • Best Movie Reviewer
  • Best Community Builder
  • Funniest Writer
  • Best Blog

Cinematic Corner

  • Best Design
  • Best Running Feature
  • Best Movie Reviewer
  • Funniest Writer
  • Best Blog

Terry Malloy’s Pigeon Coop

  • Best Rating System
  • Best New Lamb
  • Best Movie Reviewer

FlixChatter

  • Best Blog-a-thon/Meme
  • Best Community Builder
  • Best Blog

Head in a Vice

  • Best New Lamb
  • Best Community Builder
  • Best Movie Reviewer

Marked Movies

  • Best New Lamb
  • Best Movie Reviewer

Dan the Man Movie Reviews

  • Best Movie Reviewer

Rhino’s Horror

  • Best Horror Blog

LAMB members can vote for the winners here, I’d be tickled pink if you’d vote for me for Best New Lamb but with the stiff competition I face for that category I can’t fault you if you go with on of my other fine cohorts.  Check out the full list of nominees here, I apologize again if I left anyone out!

Posted in General Announcements | Tagged , , , | 14 Comments